My Grandmother, Part I—Belfast

My grandmother, Agnes Kyle, was born in Belfast, Ireland, October 20, 1899. The youngest of eight children, she was born off the Sandy Row, then as now a Protestant stronghold. The house was likely of the two-up and two-down variety—too small for ten people. And they were large people too, with raven hair, olive complexions, and dark eyes. The neighbors called them “The Spaniards,” and indeed they looked more Spanish than Irish. Stories abound about the source of this coloring—the surviving sailors from wreckage of The Spanish Armada in the 16th century, hidden from the English along the northern coast of Ireland and the southern coast of Scotland (https://www.constancegemmett.com/origins-hello-sailor/) .

Whether or not that bit of tantalizing trivia is true or not , my grandmother’s ancestors lived in Kyle, part of Ayershire, Scotland. Ayershire is on the southwest coast, on the Firth of Clyde, and not far across the North Channel from the northeastern-most coast of Ireland.

How the Ulster-Scots Came To Be

My grandmother’s ancestors left Ayershire to set up shop in the north of Ireland (the Ulster Province) as part of the Ulster Plantation. Designed under King James I (1566-1625), the Plantation brought settlers from Scotland and England to Ireland, where they were given land formerly occupied by native Irish. Farmers and tradespeople, the settlers were installed to dilute the Gaelic influence of the Irish Kings (most of whom fled) and the native Irish. Similarly, Great Britons arrived on the American East Coast to settle lands given by royal decree, dispossessing the American natives.

To create the Ulster Plantation, lands were given to wealthy settlers in 1606 (not coincidentally, Jamestown, Virginia was first settled in 1607), and ordinary people were brought over to work for the wealthy settlers throughout the 17th century.

Still Farming, Two Centuries Later

Fast-forward to the mid 19th century, and my grandmother’s grandparents were still farming in the northeast of Ireland. Only so many people could fit on a farm however, unlike a two-up-two-down Belfast house, and so the industries of Belfast beckoned. Rope makers, tobacco processing, shipbuilding, and the largest linen production in the world—all offered jobs—low paying and increasingly difficult to get as the century grew older. The descendants of the settlers flocked to Belfast, a leader in the Industrial Revolution and nicknamed “Linenopolis,” crowded with job seekers, polluted by the belching chimneys of industry, and the cheap coal used for heating.

Ascendancy/Descendency

The Protestant population—brought to Ireland to Anglicize the country, repress the native Catholic Irish, and seal its union with Great Britain under the King—ruled the roost. The wealthy version became known as the Ascendancy, living in the big houses built on lands granted. But the farmer class Protestants needed the jobs Belfast offered in the 19th century, so the Catholics were pushed out of many jobs.

Home Rule—Not Yet—There’s a War On

The Act of Union of 1800 merged Ireland and Great Britain. It was strongly opposed, and with violence, but the movement collapsed. What was left morphed into the movement for Home Rule, or Irish votes for Irish political parties and Irish representation—a state of dominion within Great Britain. This movement was strong in much of the island of Ireland (excepting the Protestants in the north), and included a bargain struck but never honored: Irishmen volunteered to join the British Army during World War I in return for implementation of Home Rule after the war. At least four bills failed to pass in Parliament from 1886 to 1920. 

A Poisoned Brew

Layered as it was on top of the memory of the Great Famines and the mass emigration of the 19th century, the brew of the big houses and failure to gain Home Rule poisoned everything. Eventually, as Irish patriots moved closer to gaining freedom, part of Ulster was partitioned from the rest of Ireland in 1922. The partition followed a series of negotiations and betrayals committed by all sides in order to gain that freedom. The partitioned section of Ulster (6 of the 9 counties of the province) remains part of the United Kingdom as Northern Ireland. With Belfast as its capital, the violence fomented—known as The Troubles—became part of everyday life in the 1920s, as the violence of the Irish War for Independence ravaged the whole of the island.

Partitioned 

The Irish Free State was formed in 1922, snipping the last tie between the 6 counties of Ulster and the rest of Ireland. The partition remained in place through the 1949 birth of the Republic of Ireland, as it does to this day.

The Free State remained neutral during World War II and refused Churchill’s pleas to allow Britain to use their many strategic harbors as British naval bases. A desperate Churchill offered to lift the partition so that the Ulster 6 could rejoin the rest of Ireland. De Valera, the Prime Minister (Taoiseach) of the Free State, said no.

Suppression

My grandmother’s father worked in the gas works, a large utility where men shoveled the coal burned to generate gas for the gaslights and gas ranges ubiquitous in the city. He worked there, where no Catholic was allowed to work, while my grandmother’s sister Margaret worked at the Harland and Wolff Shipyard—builder of RMS Titanic. The shipyards purged all Catholic workers in the 1920s—often committing beatings and drownings to discourage return—as they had been purged from civil service, utilities and many industries.

The violence of those purges and the rioting afterward reached its peak in 1922. What followed was a ratcheting of the discrimination against Catholics—the removal of the vote, nightly curfews, neighborhood raids and arrests without cause, burning of businesses—intimidation by murder, rape and arson undertaken by a new class of “policemen,” the B Specials—The Black and Tans (a brainchild of Winston Churchill).

Catholic or Protestant?

How did anyone discover what a person’s religion was? For one thing, the handy “RC” for Roman Catholic stamped on a baby’s birth certificate followed the baby through its life. For most people their home address and school name were telltale (since many native Irish names already had been Anglicized, surnames of Catholics were not necessarily native Irish). In desperation, some Catholics tried to pass as Protestants in order to work. The threat of discovery hung over their heads and encouraged extreme violence against them.

Historians Please Forgive

The above is a boiled-down and simplistic history of Ireland and Belfast in particular. It is at least a description of the culture into which my grandmother was born at the very end of the 19th century. She grew up in poverty and was a young woman at the height of the 1920s Troubles, the like of which was not seen again until the 1970s. How did the culture of violence affect my grandmother’s life? The reader will be able to guess some of the ways in which it may have affected her, but there are others which may be more hidden—and hiding was key—which will be revealed in the next post, My Grandmother, Part II—Belfast and Brooklyn.

 

 

A Bigger Boat

We had an interesting summer, here in Massachusetts. A summer scripted by the 1970’s megahit movie Jaws, in which actor Roy Scheider improvised the iconic line, “We’re gonna need a bigger boat,” after the Great White Shark movie puppet leapt out of the water onto the back of the studio boat at him. The waters off the beautiful and wild beaches of Cape Cod are swarming with Great Whites. Drawn to the shorelines by an abundance of seals, they have settled into hunting close to shore, where they encounter the humans who enter the waters regardless. Sharks test what they encounter with their teeth the way we use our hands. Even if the shark decides it does not have hold of what it really likes to eat, the testing is extremely damaging.

Swimming With Sharks

After Labor Day there are no lifeguards patrolling the beaches of the National Seashore on the Cape, but there are more than adequate shark warning signs. Despite those, humans are still entering these waters to swim and surf. This summer a middle-aged man was attacked while standing close to shore—he survived. Just last weekend, a young man was attacked on his boogie board—he died. The beaches have closed. The ordinarily great end of summer and early fall tourist season on the Cape is in tatters.

Be Proactive

Earlier in the summer, the local newspapers carried articles about the sharks, with titles like “How to Avoid An Encounter With a Great White Shark.” How to avoid such an encounter seems obvious, but if a person is hell bent on taking the chance by entering the water, the articles also explained what to do during an encounter. The victim is urged to be proactive and attack the shark’s eyes and gills, which are very sensitive. Even so, one must be in a position to do so, especially since the eyes and gills surround the mouth. Not an easy task when your body or your surfboard is being chased by a 20 foot, 1000 pound eating machine that can swim 25 mph.

You’re Gonna Need A Bigger Boat

Even a Great White expert studying the Cape Cod phenomenon had a close encounter. Standing on the flying bridge of a research boat, his feet were nearly caught in the maw of a Great White as it leapt up to his level. Sharks hunt seals from depth, launching them as high as ten feet into the air. Surfboards and kayaks just don’t cut it—shark infested waters require a bigger boat.

The Here and Now

In the more placid waters of the hills of Western Massachusetts, we’ve little to fear from sharks. However, the amount of water that has poured down on us this summer has been disconcerting. There were weeks when our weather was tropical—very hot and humid, with deluges every afternoon. As the swollen rivers, creeks and brooks raged, and the tomato plants suffered, climate change became the here and now. Not a future event, but now. And it showed its presence everywhere in the country and the world, from the wildfires in our west, to the drought in Ireland. As the remnants of Hurricane Florence blew through New England this week, we pondered the amount of water pouring down the hillsides and wondered if we too were in need of a bigger boat?

 

 

 

Lost Dog

I became  involved with  a lost dog earlier this month. First, I saw the poster in the general store window. The photo, the dog’s name, date and location last seen, and the owner’s phone number. It broke my heart.

Lost Dog, Lost Cause

A lost dog is considered a lost cause around here. Too many coyotes, bears, fisher cats, logging trucks—all waiting to end the lost dog’s days.

A day later, I met the owner on the road where she’d lost the dog. She told me that the dog pulled out of her grasp to chase deer at the end of the field. The dog still had her leash on. The owner was in agony.

Leashed Lost Dog, Doomed

A lost dog wearing a leash is doomed. The leash gets snagged and the dog is stuck. Visions of tethered goats come to mind.

Arthur And I Go Into Action!

The next day I leashed my dog Arthur, packed water, and dressed like I was on some sort of gardening safari: hat, long-sleeved shirt, long pants, high boots, gloves, all doused in insect spray. It was very hot, but I knew we were going into rough terrain to look for the lost dog.

Behind the field where the lost dog was last seen, behind our friends’ house, looms a very large and wild place called Forge Hill. First we drove the length of a rough dirt road that traverses the area. I drove slowly, called the dog’s name, and stopped to listen. After that we parked back at the field and began the hard part of the search. Crossing the field was not as easy as I’d imagined, but what lay beyond it was so much worse.

My thinking was that if the lost dog was snagged on her leash, she might still be alive and not too far into the woods, especially if she was near the river that runs alongside and could access water. Alive or not, I thought it would be better for the owner to know.

What On Earth Were We Doing?

Arthur and I plunged into a swamp full of brambles. We scanned the river’s edges. We turned and began the ascent into the forest, littered with cut logs and dead branches—a very difficult climb already. I called the lost dog’s name. Going forward seemed hopeless. Going backwards seemed worse. I decided to go up.

The Ascent

It is no exaggeration to write that “up” was a 45-degree angle, littered with cut logs and branches, but also with plenty of standing and thin trees to grab at intervals. At the top, if we could climb it, we would be rescued by our friends’ flat, clear property. We climbed.

Arthur and his four paws pulled me and helped at crucial moments. However, he was hot and tired, and at times tried to go back down. He sat down and gave me a look. I grabbed a small tree, hoisted myself up and leaned on it while he rested.

Halfway up it occurred to me that while I’d done this kind of nutty, adventurous, and  challenging thing often in my childhood and youth, I was well beyond all of that now. Or I should have been. Yet here we were, halfway up.

Past Halfway

Closer to the top the ascent became impossibly steep and I followed Arthur’s lead and dropped onto my hands and knees. Arthur may have recognized our friends’ property, the smell of it, or he decided that he was going to pull me up and be done with this insanity. Visions of broken legs and another lost dog, lost woman, danced in my head.

Saved

We arrived at the top and while I was thrilled, I was very happy nobody saw my ignominious arrival on all fours, sweating profusely, dressed like a gardener at V. Sackville-West’s Sissinghurst.

Our reward, besides an uninjured continuance of life, was a lovely bench. I hadn’t any idea that our friends had placed a wooden bench close to the cliff’s edge, but there it was. Gratefully flopping onto it, I pulled a water bottle and a collapsible dog bowl out of my pockets, and Arthur and I shared a cool drink.

Welcome

While our friends placed the bench in this lovely spot for their own reverie and relaxation, it felt like they’d put it there just for us, for our revival, our welcome. We sat there for quite a while, gazing down at the river (a long way down) and up at the mountain across from this spot.

Rousing ourselves, we walked the length of the cliff’s edge, while I called the lost dog’s name. I’d felt sure that Arthur was going to find the lost dog, but he did not. We’d kept ourselves from becoming lost, but the bench saved us.

Lost Dog, Not Doomed

A few days later, I returned to the general store. The lost dog sign was gone. The lost dog had been found—hungry, but OK. Not all lost dogs are lost causes or doomed. Not this lost dog. It was one of the best pieces of news I’ve had in a long time.

The 4th of July

“He who drinks a fifth on the fourth, does not go forth on the fifth,” was one of my father’s favorite jokes. The 4th of July always reminds me of my father, but this year, I am thinking of his family, going back generations. My nostalgia may be because the 4th of July is such an old-fashioned holiday, the ultimate American one, and for me, both describe my father’s family. The joke also contains the word used to describe a defunct liquor bottle volume: a fifth of a U.S. gallon. The word used in that way also reminds me of the family.

Tales of the bond boy

As a child, I was much closer to my mother’s family than my father’s. Besides my father, the only one in his family whom I knew well was the younger of his two sisters, Kate. Aunt Kate made herself a constant in my life. She told me that the first Emmett to arrive on these shores was a bond boy—an indentured servant—sailing from England to Philadelphia in the 18th century.

Daughters of the American Revolution, here I come

I tucked that nugget away for many years before pursuing it. Aunt Kate also told me that someone in the family fought in the American Revolution, which seemed more interesting to me at the time, not to mention more seemly to my snobbish little self.

An interest shared

When my father was well entrenched in his long, last illness, I researched both sides of his family. We corresponded about them: I asked if so-and-so could be part of the family, he replied with the information he remembered. I wrote by email via my techie mother, he wrote letters. The reward was much easier communication than we’d shared in my life. After years peppered with silence and anger, we were talking easily at last, even though he could no longer actually talk.

The bond boy found

I found the bond boy on a ship’s manifest: one Henry Emmett. Captured in The Complete Book of Emigrants, 1751-1776, by Peter Wilson Coldham is the description of Henry’s indentured state, the voyage, his name, origin, age, and occupation. The bibliography is as follows: “A comprehensive listing compiled from English public records of those who took ship to the Americas for political, religious, and economic reasons; of those who were deported for vagrancy, roguery, or non-conformity; and of those who were sold to labour in the new colonies (Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1993).”

A miserable trip

From February 27-6 March 1775, Henry Emmett was on board a ship sailing from Bristol, England to Philadelphia—the HMS Salty—to fulfill a binding contract owned by a Mr. James Russel. Henry is listed as hailing from Bath, England, aged 32, and a saw maker. Several other indentured fellows sailed with him, and their names and occupations are listed. Sharing the frigid voyage was an indentured woman, listed as “A woman.”

The 4th of July, 1776

Henry Emmett arrived in colonial Philadelphia in March, 1775. On the 4th of July, 1776, he stood on the streets of a new nation. He was an ordinary person, probably with little education. What did it mean to him? Was he able to escape the bond that brought him across the ocean? Did he wish to return to England, or was did he want to stay?

My ancestor?

Other than his surname, what evidence do I have that Henry was my ancestor? He was a saw maker: an occupation carried down the generations to my own Grandfather Emmett. By the taking of the 1790 census under President George Washington, Henry was still living in Philadelphia with his wife and children. Henry was “the head of the household.” The male children were described as “free white males.” The women and girls were not described other than their number.

Same job, same neighborhood

In addition to the generations of men in my family who worked as saw makers, from Henry’s time the Emmett family continued to live in the same neighborhood of Philadelphia: Kensington, where my father and his sisters grew up.

Why indentured?

Why was Henry Emmett indentured? He had an occupation, so I assume that he was not a vagrant. Was he a rogue? a non-conformist? Did he sail for political, or religious, or economic reasons? Even though he might have been a rogue in England (and that has a certain appeal for me), my money is on economic reasons: he carried debt he could not pay.

One and the same person?

Whatever he was in England, once free from his bond here, he settled into colonial Philadelphian life. After the American Revolution, he maintained his life in Philadelphia as a family man. In between, did he serve in the American Revolution? Was Henry both the bond boy and the soldier in the American Revolution of Aunt Kate’s tales?

Fodder for the fiction writer

My research will continue by studying indentured servitude, Mr. Coldham’s compendium, and the rolls of Pennsylvanians who served in the American Revolution. I’ll pour through the census pages from Henry Emmett’s time until I see the link between us. I’ll take it up again because I write historical fiction, and I have an idea about how to use this research: this story is fodder for a fiction writer.

Rare merriment

There’s nobody in my Emmett family to share this information with now: I’m an only child with no children, my father’s sisters had no children, and my father has not been alive to celebrate the 4th of July for fifteen years. Still, I can hear and see him declaiming the cautionary joke about drinking a fifth on the fourth with a rare look of merriment.

The Children

They’ve been much on our minds, this week, the children. Children detained together in cages, frightened. I’ve heard the same party line that you have, from officials who have not visited the detention centers: that the children are well cared for, that it is the law to separate the children from their parents, that they and their parents are infesting our nation, that their parents were sent here because they are criminals. I’ve seen what you’ve seen: desperate women and men forced to hand their sobbing children over to an uncertain fate.

An Act of Desperation

What is it about the children and their parents that some Americans hate so much: their color? their poverty? their language? their desperation? Check, check, check. Whatever we are told about them—their many crimes, their gang affiliations—one thing is certain: they are desperate, and some Americans don’t care. They’d have to be desperate to pay the unscrupulous coyotes to guide them on a perilous journey with their children; a journey with an uncertain and dangerous end. The end is indeed dangerous for the children and for their parents: they may never be reunited.

Reunion?

The question of reunion never seemed to enter the official mind. The parents detained or turned back don’t have the same ID as the children. The children are being sent all over the country. The parents are poor people with no clout and little English: how will they find their children? Who will help them?

Officials now are arguing about the creation of tent camps to house entire families gathered up at the border. The outcry about the ripping of the children away from their parents has created an official solution: incarcerate everyone. “There,” they seem to say to the people of this country, “happy now? The children will stay with their parents, so shut up.” No, not happy. What happens to the families in the tents? Do they stay there forever? Are they interned until the parents are old and the children have their own children? What is the government doing in our names?

History disagrees

There’s been much talk about how we are no longer the nation we thought we were. Thinking about our history, I would have to disagree. Sadly, and in the 21st century, we are showing ourselves to be the nation we’ve always been. There are not too many people of Native American, African American or Latino American ancestry in the president’s base, just because of the attempts at extinction and the injustices they’ve suffered at the nation’s hands, at the hands of those in power who hate them.

Jewish and Italian immigrants were ghettoized once they reached Miss Liberty’s arms, and the Irish escaping famine were mistreated in 19th century America. Japanese Americans were put into internment camps during World War II, their homes and businesses confiscated and never returned. The U.S. government turned away ships of escaping Jews on the cusp of the war, and never participated in the British program of offering asylum to the children after their parents were taken to concentration camps in Germany, Austria, Poland, the Czech lands.

Shameful

Over three centuries, the ones who immigrated to these shores from Europe hated the others, saw them as other, brought their slaves, and grabbed the power, the land, and liberty of others’. To modern eyes, that shameful history worked its way into our consciousness as wrong in the middle of the 19th century and seemed on firmer ground in the 21st century. Our nation has regressed over the years just as much as it has progressed, but our hatred of people of color, of poverty, of otherness has erupted again. Was that animus stewing in the DNA of Americans who approve of these detention camps? Do they see desperate people fleeing to our border as an infestation? Was I wrong to hope that this hatred was gone for good?

Helping the children

The president did not win the popular vote, but he did win the election because of the eruption of hatred and despite the many Americans of good will. The people of good will have few routes to helping the children now: voting, protesting, disobeying, and demanding that those who represent us and are silent find the backbone and represent the best in us, not the worst. We all must engage, vigorously, and succeed quickly.

June 28th Women’s March, Washington, DC https://www.endfamilyseparation.us/?link_id=2&can_id=32098368e2b0501c35d5c691d3bba815&source=email-its-getting-worse&email_referrer=email_374543___subject_463881&email_subject=theyre-planning-more-child-prisons

League of Women Voters to help register voters, modernize voting, push back on voter restrictions: https://www.lwv.org/

https://www.lwvma.org/

A Living Website

I created a living website this week one year ago. Like a living thing, the living website became a part of my daily life. I wrote my first post, found a photo, and clicked “Publish.” My hands shook. Over the last twelve months, I’ve published 36 posts, an average of 3 posts per month (my goal was an average of 4).

Who Needs An Author’s Platform?…Duh

My effort to understand and build an author’s platform began at the Writer’s Digest Annual Conference. I attended talks by diyMFA (do-it-yourself Master of Fine Arts) instigator, Gabriela Pereira. In January 2017, I enrolled in (https://diymfa.com/) diyMFA’s Pixels to Platform online course, or P2P.

Website Shy

It seemed as though a writer’s blog was the way to go for me. I had never created a website, and in no stretch of the imagination am I handy around a computer beyond the basics.

P2P to the Rescue!

Gabriel’s talks and P2P were informative, empowering, and inspirational. P2P covers a broad range of topics for published and emerging writers in search of an author’s platform. The topics move from getting over your imposter syndrome, to losing the fear and loathing of branding and marketing, to the technical stuff of starting a website and a blog. I completed P2P with a step-by-step guide to starting my website, my brand, and blog, and most importantly, how to draw readers to it.

Paralyzed by Fear

Still, for months I lingered somewhere between thinking I could do it, and yet not doing it. The paralysis settled in. I knew it was ridiculous, but there it was: I was afraid to try following the instructions.

Gabriela to the Rescue!

I called on Gabriela Pereira yet again, this time in a one-on-one series of mentoring sessions (Platform VIP Mentoring). She confirmed that as an emerging writer, I should focus on a blog. After the first session, I had the assignment: create a live website for her to review in two weeks.

Gulp. There it was: the push I needed.

Just Do It!

There was no choice: I took the plunge (I make my deadlines). In a flurry, I bought my URL domain(s) from GoDaddy and chose WordPress.org as my platform. Bluehost is my server manager, but I’m reconsidering them after a huge jump in fee. Choosing a simple theme in Penscratch, I took advantage of the how-to’s on the WordPress site. I chose my colors, the content and photos for three pages: Home, About, Contact.

I’d gone live!  It wasn’t perfect, but it was a living website, and I’d created it.

Sending the link to Gabriela, I prepared for the next session. We got to work together on what else I had to do and change, including mapping what I wanted to write about, but most importantly how I would get anyone to read it, respond, come back. Repeat.

What is SEO anyway?

There was a lot more to do, and there still is. With the help of online sources and good friends, I figured out that I needed search engine optimization, and downloaded the Yoast SEO into my website. WordPress.org (better for writers than WordPress.com) and Yoast (https://yoast.com/) make it very easy to acquire all the help you need for secure visibility. It took a while, but when you Google Constance Emmett, the first thing listed is my website.

More Paralysis…

What I haven’t done, and what I must do, is to build my readership (thank you to the dear readers that visit). I’ve learned the techniques from P2P, but I haven’t done the work required to implement them. The same good friends who helped me with the technical stuff confirmed that to build a website’s readership requires a lot of work. The effort is time-consuming, but there isn’t any other way.

To attract readers, I must spend more time on other websites, engage with the author and the other writers who visit, comment, and leave a trail. I must leave a trail of breadcrumbs (a P2P phrase that resonates) to this living website.

What about the posts?

On May 9, 2017 I published the first post, “Country Drama,” which (https://www.constancegemmett.com/hello-world/) I enjoyed writing. I’ve continued to write and post about nature, living in the country and my family. In addition, I write about authors, writing, the effect of Brexit on Ireland and vice versa, cleaning, baseball, gun violence, Trump, seasons, and weather. I write about things that interest me, things that I think will interest my readers, including one day, readers of my fiction.

Writing the posts is often enjoyable, sometimes like pulling teeth: just like writing fiction. When the SEO takes a look at draft post, it has many things to say about the writing and the tags that will be picked up on the Internet. I rewrite the post before it’s added to the living website and before I publish it. Again, just like writing fiction: lots of rewriting (https://www.constancegemmett.com/writing-is-rewriting/).

Take the Plunge

If you are frozen between wanting an author’s platform and starting one, please take the plunge. To help, I recommend diyMFA and P2P, and also all of the information available on WordPress.org and the many website creators on You Tube who can walk you through the process. Ask friends for help, too.

A Living Website Is Better than a Perfect One

The first step is key. Remember: a living website is better than a perfect one. Think of it as the first sentence of your novel. You know you’ll write many more sentences, and most will be rewritten, more than once. Without the first version of the very first sentence though, there will never be a novel.

Writing Is Rewriting

Writing is rewriting. Writing is rewriting. Writers know that, or think they do, until it’s pointed out to them that it’s time for yet another rewrite. If you are a writer, if it’s in your bones, you look at the subject of the suggestion for a rewrite and get to work rewriting. All writers, published or emerging, know about rewriting.

Readers who are not writers don’t think about how many times the story they are enjoying was rewritten. And that’s the point. It should not feel rewritten, and by the time a novel sees the light of day, it should read as though the writer had not labored over every sentence and tweaked every word—but she did.

Rejection, rejection, rejection: repeat

Stories of rejection are widely known, and some are amusing now, although I know they weren’t at the time:
JK Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone was rejected 14 times
Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With The Wind was rejected 38 times
George Orwell’s Animal Farm was rejected because “It is impossible to sell animal stories in the USA”
The Diary of Anne Frank was rejected because “The girl doesn’t, it seems to me, to have a special perception or feeling which would lift that book above the curiosity level.” Hmmm… that sentence could use a rewrite.

All is rewritten, and not on the wind

Emerging writers hold these rejections close when yet another one of their own comes across the bar. Tales of rewriting are not so prominent.With the exception of Anne Frank, what we don’t know is how many times Rowling, Mitchell and Orwell rewrote all or parts of their novels—but there’s little doubt that they did. There are exceptions: Edna O’Brien claimed that The Country Girls trilogy wrote themselves, which may be hyperbole or truth; they are wonderful novels regardless. But not too many instances of such claims come to mind.

Even biographies of published and famous writers don’t mention rewriting, other than the mention of an editor’s help, or in the case of To Kill A Mockingbird, the editor totally rewriting the author’s version into the novel we know. Biographers don’t dwell on the writer’s daily tooth brushing, either. A biography has to move along just as a novel does to keep the emotional and intellectual momentum. And so this important fact of a writing life remains in the closet, until the emerging writer discovers it for herself. As mentioned above, if writing is in your bones, if you can’t give it up, you’ll take the suggestion for a rewrite as pure gold, settle in, and rewrite.

Writers Are Not Alone

All artists rewrite, as it were. Musicians, dancers, actors, painters, sculptors and architects all practice a form of rewriting. The preparation—rehearsals, study, daily practice, making sketches and tweaking them— take the place of a writer’s twelfth tweak of a sentence. However, writers have more latitude. We can obliterate characters or change the plot utterly before publication. The tree painted is pretty much the tree painted—the amount of tweaking possible is minimal. Once a cellist plays a note, a singer sings, or an actor speaks a line, it can’t be placed back in the bottle. The preparation, the rewriting, is more on display for other artists.

No Palm Trees Please

The act of rewriting is a fact of life, but not only in art. Gardening, baking, and cooking all demand change and tweaking as the practitioner grows in skills and knowledge: these activities demand practice. The gardener often must yield to the force of nature as well. No matter how skilled she is, planting palm trees along the border of Vermont will not work.

Privacy

Writers are lucky that their first and fiftieth attempts at a sentence are private. We have the luxury of having the time to think about every word before we commit to one. Rewriting is a fact of life. If writing is a fact of life for you, then rewriting must be too: writing is rewriting.

Red—A Frabjous Color

“O frabjous day! Callooh callay! He chortled in his joy.” from “Jabberwocky,” by Lewis Carroll

By April 6th, we in the Northeast of the United States expect a frabjous day or two per week. Instead of delightful days, we are due for more cold, wind, and snow for our delight. The sight of the red  male cardinal against the landscape is as startling as it was in November! Wednesday felt on the verge of bone chilling, and was very wet. My eyes scanned the seemingly desolate landscape of our field and hills. Suddenly, they snapped into a higher level of seeing, and were filled with the colors of the landscape. Why had I never seen these colors of April before? My eyesight hasn’t changed: I haven’t had eye surgery, and while newish, my eyeglasses are a similar prescription. I haven’t suffered a blow to the head.

What was the difference? I looked.

What did I see when I really looked? I saw the amber and honey of the winter field grasses, the copper and ocher of dead leaves. Nothing dull, nothing desolate. My optic nerve transmitted the brilliant green of moss on trees, pieces of Ireland transported. The cones in my retina mediated the green-black of the evergreens, the verdigris of lichen on the trees, and the rust of the sumac fruits.

Looking again, I saw that the daffodils poking up are a scallion green, a much darker green than the lilies likewise exploring and retreating. The iron gray-green of the small river, dotted with grey and white stones, churning white as it sweeps its minerals and little fish toward the ocean. The browns, whites, and peach colors of the bare tree trunks standing ready for something to happen aloft (and something is happening—the sap is running). The blue jays, blue birds, and the raspberry heads of the male purple finches at the feeder providing shots of color to the palette of the yard.

The Eyes Have It

No two people see colors exactly the same, or so I’ve experienced, as in, “You call that green? It’s blue!” My eye is less expert at finding the colors that my  friend Trina Sternstein, a painter of exquisite and provocative landscape, is able to see (http://www.trinasearssternstein.net/gallery). However, there is one thing I can write with some certainty: except for one fellow, nothing in our landscape now is red.

“Red in tooth and claw;”

Nature is red in tooth and claw, but there’s been little sign of red lately. Nothing even hints at red, except our male cardinal, who more than hints—he shouts, sings, and dances red. He was our constant red this winter, living with his lady wife, herself a lovely brown and orange. Against the white of snow or the bare, brown branches, his red continues to startle and please. He’s so very red and visible—as a streak flying by or sitting still in his handsomeness. It’s hard to see how he survives the hawks, but he does. The cardinals stay here for the winter and don’t endure the stress of migration. They build their nests (he brings the materials, she builds the nest to fit her body) early. Although cardinals are not good at producing fledglings that survive, they have more than one brood per season, which increases their chances.

In this blessedly peaceful place, patience must reign. We must wait just a little while for more red, of a more gentle, less tooth and claw source. The buds on trees will swell and turn red; sunsets will produce a red among the gold, pink and purple. The red male cardinal will sing his arias to protect his territory, and bring seeds to his wife, and feed them to her.

Finally, when our frabjous days arrive, the cardinal’s redness will cease to startle and please as much, as the leafed trees, and red and purple flowers overwhelm our fields of vision.

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/42916/jabberwockyhttps://www.theparisreview.org

http://www.talkinbirds.com/

http://www.theotherpages.org/poems/books/tennyson/tennyson04.html

 

Spring!

The Birds Know

Spring! This morning there are six robins pecking at the sumac outside my window, and the first purple finch is enjoying one of our feeders. Do they have calendars? The vernal equinox occurred at 12:15 PM yesterday our time, and here these new birds are today. For months we’ve enjoyed watching juncos, chickadees, a cardinal pair, bluejays and mourning doves. There are new birds in town now.

Several weeks ago I noticed that the sun was warming to my face, no matter the blasting wind gusts or the low temperatures. Similarly, the birds knew something had changed, and their chirping changed to singing.

Saved

Spring. Today is the first full day of spring, and whatever the weather, we can breathe a sigh of relief. We’re alive and we made it through the winter. Although our hills and yards are covered with snow, and we’re due for a little more tonight, it won’t last. The sun is too strong. So strong now that on a sunny day, the temperature in my study rises to the high 70s with the room heat turned off.

Hope Springs

This week is very like all those first weeks of school: hope is high, plans are made, ambition runs rampant. My mind races with plans to create a true pollinator habitat in our field, complete with three seasons of blooming flowers for nectar and pollen for butterflies and bees. Milkweed for the Monarch butterflies. A habitat for the overwintering Swallowtail chrysalis.

The indoor seed germination kit is up and running, the lights and the heating mat are on. The peas—pisum—and lettuce seeds planted. My hope and ambition outpace skill, but that is what spring is for, and there is guidance: The Victory Garden is open to the chapter, “March.”

Outdoor house projects will commence next month, but March has to be devoted to plants and the thirst for the sight of flowers, the snowdrop the first among them. Bedding plants are on order, so is fencing for a new garden in the field. Visions of more fruit trees dance in my head. Wisteria drip from an imagined trellis. Roses and clematis twine and bloom. There are no beetles or black spot to mar their beauty.

Head Over Heels

Am I carried away? Oh, yes. As the heads of the daffodils and lilies poke through the frost, it’s love at first sight.

Memory tempers my lust. I know from experience that I will have failures, disappointments, and slugs as we round into summer. I remember that each August brings a great, hot fatigue to me, and a longing for winter, or at least crisp, fall days.

No Regrets

Today, though, is the first full day of spring. If I swear that I won’t buy too many plants and plant them too close together, will the gardening gods spare me? It doesn’t matter. Today, there are no regrets.

https://xerces.org/

https://www.rodalesorganiclife.com/garden/monthly-garden-calendar-northeastern-united-states

https://ag.umass.edu/landscape/publications-resources/umass-extensions-garden-calendar

Marjory Stoneman Douglas

Incredibly, two good things emerged in the aftermath of the massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High. The first is the spirit and activism of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas students. The students’ activism and resolve has whipped around the country. These students and their supporters have given the majority of our citizens—the same majority that wants gun control—a much-needed boost. Suddenly, the idea of saying no to the NRA and all who take their money is on everyone’s lips. “No” is on their signs, on petitions, in political campaigns, and in corporate boardrooms.

Two Women

The second is the discovery of Marjory Stoneman Douglas herself. An author and activist, she dedicated her life to restoring, protecting and preserving the Everglades. Published in 1947, her The Everglades: River of Grass changed the way people viewed the vast swamp. Before Douglas’s book, the Everglades were something to be drained, a vast opportunity for commercial developers. Douglas was ahead of her time in making people see the intricate and essential environment of interwoven ecosystems that is the Everglades. Rachel Carson, the groundbreaking scientist and nature writer, was forging paths to environmental protection and science with her writings at the same time. Both women were lonely voices in  1940s and 1950s America. Both women later were inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame. https://www.womenofthehall.org

Open Your Eyes

Douglas made people open their eyes to the value of preserving the Everglades. Both women asked a simple but critical question—to quote Rachel Carson, “One way to open your eyes is to ask yourself, what it I had never seen this before? What if I knew I would never see it again?”

A Remarkable Place

If it weren’t for the work that Douglas did in her 108-year life (1890-1998), there would be little of the remarkable Everglades left. The 1.5 million acre wetland occupies the entire southern tip of Florida, and is often compared to a grassy, slow-moving river. Made up of coastal mangroves, sawgrass marshes and pine flatwoods, it is home to hundreds of animal species, including the endangered Florida panther, West Indian manatee, Leatherback turtle, and American crocodile. Home to the ubiquitous American alligator, too. https://www.nationalparks.org/explore-parks/everglades-national-park.

Marjory Stoneman Douglas saved the Everglades as a national park for all of us to visit and study. It’s vast acreage of plants and trees is a positive in this time of accelerated climate change. Most importantly, it is a protected habitat, thanks to Marjory Stoneman Douglas. For her decades-long successful struggle to restore and preserve the Everglades, she received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Clinton. Upon her death, President Clinton said, “Long before there was an Earth Day, Mrs. Douglas was a passionate steward of our nation’s natural resources, and particularly her Florida Everglades.”

A Remarkable Life

Marjory Stoneman was born in Minnesota and educated in Massachusetts. Graduating magna cum laude from Taunton High School, she studied English literature at Wellesley College. After graduating in 1912, she endured a calamitous marriage to Kenneth Douglas briefly, and traveled to Florida to work on her father’s newspaper, which became the Miami Herald.

During World War I, she left the paper and served with the American Red Cross in Europe, returning to become an editor on her father’s paper—first for the society pages, of course, but later, writing and editing meatier subjects.

Douglas was never far away from her activism whatever she wrote about, whether in newspaper articles, fiction, plays and non-fiction books. She focused on the lives of women, life in southern Florida, the threat of rapid commercial development, and environmental issues. Her activism and thirst for social justice led her to campaign for improved housing conditions, free milk for impoverished children, and the ratification of the Women’s Suffrage Amendment. Meanwhile, she dedicated her life to saving the Everglades.

Her legacy is written in the Everglades, but also in the activism of the students of the high school named after her. She would be proud of these young people.

Her Home Town

Farther north, in Taunton, Massachusetts, a group of 2016 middle school students campaigned the mayor and city council to bring Douglas’s legacy back to the town where she grew up. The kids were successful, and the spotted turtle wetland next to their school was dedicated and named “The Marjory Stoneman Douglas Turtle Sanctuary.” She would be very pleased, and proud of these children, too.

Marjory Stoneman wrote an ode for her 1908 graduation from Taunton High School, sung at the ceremony. The last lines may serve to remind us of the value of activism, the value of working and striving, the value of hope and speaking up—especially when all seems lost, as it does in these dark and violent times:

But the trail calls us on; let us turn and be gone,

For heights are yet to be passed.

With courage to strive and with purpose alive

Let us climb bravely on to the last.

After the massacre, Brenda Ruggiero, the teacher who helped dedicate the Taunton turtle sanctuary, spoke to the local paper about Douglas. “She was an activist and a journalist and wanted people to speak up for what they think is right. She stood up to big business and saved the Everglades. If she were alive today, I do believe she would want someone to speak up.”

The students at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School are speaking up, and leading the way.